1999
Pleistocene tundra-steppe: arguments pro and con
Publication
Publication
Deinsea , Volume 6 - Issue 1 p. 199- 210
The hypothesized existence of a Pleistocene ‘tundra-steppe’ must find support in three components: phytogeography, palynology, and paleozoology. However, in reality each component separately does not provide the evidence to uphold the interpreted existence of a tundra-steppe. We suggest the idea of tundra-steppe is a false scenario that prevents us from understanding the actual habitats that existed in the Pleistocene.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , | |
Deinsea | |
CC BY 3.0 NL ("Naamsvermelding") | |
Organisation | Natuurhistorisch Museum Rotterdam |
J.P. Kozhevnikov, & V.V. Ukraintseva. (1999). Pleistocene tundra-steppe: arguments pro and con. Deinsea, 6(1), 199–210.
|